National Disaster Plan - more contributions to the small business owners insurance premium

Here's another example of "proactive" government in action. According to a post entitled "What Florida really wants - other peoples money" in one of my favorite blogs, RiskProf, John McCain, the nominee for the republican nomination for President, does not support a national catastrophe plan, while the democratic nominee for President, Barrack Obama, and some governors do. Of course what this really means is that those of you not living near a coastal area could still end up subsidizing those of you that choose to. The main thrust of the disaster plan would be to create an emergency cash reserve set up for states to access in the case of future natural disasters, such as Hurrican Katrina or rampant wildfires. This fund would be federally managed, always a cause for concern, with funds contributed by private insurance companies. Obviously the governors that are vocally backing this plan happen to preside in coastal areas. As Mr. McCain stated, this would expand the role of the federal government into the private insurance market. The problem as I see it is that we already have a federally supervised flood program in place. Some states, such as Florida, already have their own disaster funds. It seems that while the populist message of their governor, laying high insurance costs at the feet of insurance companies, and adding more state regulation to said companies, isn't enough. It looks like the funds are lacking should a large scale disaster hit them, so what better way than to support a national fund to help backstop their fiscally faltering local initiatives. Either way, more government involvement will add up to higher premiums for small business owners and the public in general.

Popular posts from this blog

Delaware Business Insurance Update from CNC Insurance Associates, " Personalization of Auto Insurance Could Reduce Rates !" 12-25-18

Insurance rates may go down in the future because of "auto personalization". What is this you ask? Imagine being charged insurance rates based on your personalized use of your auto. If you drive very little next week, then your rates go down. If you drive the speed limit most of the time, your rates go down. If you avoid hard braking and tailgating, your rates go down. Get the picture?  The use of telematics has given the insurance industry a chance to personalize insurance costs directly to the users' driving habits. Gone may be the days of surcharging a male driver under the age of 24 just because they are young. If the telematics show that he can drive as safe and responsible as a 40 year old, then his insurance premiums should be comparable. If you go on vacation and park the car for two weeks, telematics will inform the insurance company that there has been no risk, and your insurance premiums will reflect that. Now as good as this sounds it will work the other wa
Read more

Get employees back to work quickly to keep work comp costs down

Image
In the past I have spoken to clients regarding a particular workers compensation claim affecting them and have asked if they have brought the employee back to work yet. Too many times the answer is no, they have nothing for that employee to do since said employee is not 100% and unable to perform their specific job prior to their workers compensation injury/claim. The problem with this is that too often employers miss the point that even though an employee can't perform in the position they were in prior to their injury, it behooves the employer to create some type of alternative task/job the employee can do until such time they are able to resume their normal duties. Bringing that employee back to work means that work comp benefits /payments in that particular claim are being curtailed, thereby saving the employer potentially more being paid out, while adding to their experience mod and driving their overall work comp expenses up.
Read more

Delaware Business Insurance Update from CNC Insurance Associates. " Mental Health Issues in the Workplace Needs Risk Management" 12-2-18

Employees with depression and severe anxiety are very common in the work place today. Studies have shown that close to 50% of all who suffer mental health issues at work are not being treated effectively. Mental health disorders do not discriminate, as it affects all employees even in the C Suite. So what is the employers' responsibility for dealing with this issue? It definitely requires risk management.  Employers can begin by making sure the health insurance that is offered to employees has mental health coverage. Many plans do not carry this coverage even though the ACA requires it. More importantly employers should create a culture of conversation which can allow employees to openly discuss their mental issues. Employee Assistant Programs set up by employers can offer education and services to help employees improve their wellness and sleep. Also employees abuse of prescription medications , need employers attention to make sure doctors and counselors are part of the assistant
Read more